In Yesterday’s June 15th 2016, hearing at Pretoria High court, the defense counsel had argued that Pistorius was a broken man and even told him to walk around the court without his prosthetic legs for the judge to see the man the world wants to send to jail. But prosecuting counsel, Gerrie Nel, in a series of explosive arguments, argued that Pistorius’ culpability instead borders on dolus directus – that is, the intention to kill.
‘The argument that Pistorius thought the person behind the door was an intruder does not make it a less serious crime. Does it detract from the fact that he is a murderer?’
‘I won’t deal with perceptions but with facts.’ Gerrie Nel, prosecuting counsel says.
‘If you want to talk about a broken man, he says, let’s talk about Barry Steenkamp (Reeva’s dad).’
‘The defence says Pistorius has accepted the court’s findings of murder. That is not the same as accepting what he did,’
“Isn’t it time we now finally let the world see what this accused did with four black talon rounds through a door?” Nel asks.
Nel then talks about Dr Scholtz testimony of Pistorius’ anxiety and depression.
‘So why did Pistorius hoard his medicine in his cell?
‘Scholtz also said he should be hospitalised, Yet no steps were taken to hospitalise him.’
‘It isn’t plausible to say he is remorseful’
‘The only plausible explanation is that the accused armed himself with the intention to shoot.’
Nel says the court should not impose a sentence less than the minimum prescribed for murder, which is 15 years’ imprisonment saying the court doesn’t start with a clean slate.
”There must be “truly convincing reasons for a different response”, he adds, reading from the regulations.
‘Undue sympathy is not an aspect that should be taken into consideration’
”Correctional supervision – essentially house arrest, which is what Pistorius has been under since leaving prison last October – is not even close to the punishment required here”
“Wholly suspending” a prison sentence, even in compelling circumstances, is not permitted.”
‘Pity will play no role in a sentence, the court can’t be seen to condone serious crime,’ he adds.
‘It’s not a clean slate. The minimum sentencing is applicable.’
Justice must still be properly administered … despite an admission of forgiveness.
Forgiveness has more to do with the person forgiving than with the crime.
The deceased has done nothing wrong … She will never walk again … The accused murdered her.
Nel says he has rarely heard such devastation from a family as that relayed by Barry Steenkamp and Kim Martin in their testimony. He says the judge has a duty to ensure:
‘The court will never be lenient on any crime that caused that grief.’
‘What the court has heard is that the accused elected to give an interview to the TV but not take this court into his confidence. That’s disrespectful to the court, It’s disrespectful to the victims of this crime, it’s disrespectful to the deceased.’
‘I caused her death is not the same as I murdered her. Without that, there can be no remorse.’
‘What motivated him? We don’t know.’
‘I cannot think of a more excessive use of a firearm … He fired four shots that tore up the body of the deceased.’
‘Is an intruder’s life not important? Did he think of that life?’
‘Reeva Steenkamp disappeared in this trial’, he says.
‘The court should take into account “who she was … what dreams she had”.
‘She is just as important as the personal circumstances of the accused … She can never walk in court.’
‘The identity of the victim is irrelevant to his guilt and irrelevant to sentence.He is guilty of the murder of Reeva. He killed her.’
“There is a difference between I am very sorry Reeva is dead and I am sorry for myself that Reeva is dead,” Nel Argued.
Sentencing of Oscar Pistorius is likely to happen on Friday.
Source: Guardian UK
No comments:
Post a Comment